Is the claim fundable?
Merits, economics, budget, recoverability and likely settlement value tested before heavy spend.
Resolution Capital
Capital is part of the strategy, not a substitute for it.
AMROR helps clients assess whether capital would improve the route to resolution and, where appropriate, helps structure, source or evaluate options transparently.
Why it matters
Claims can have value before they have cash.
Complex disputes often require capital before value can be recovered. The question is not simply whether money is available. The question is whether the economics, enforcement path, timing, reputation risk and settlement dynamics justify the next move.
AMROR brings the capital question into the wider strategy, so that capital options, legal strategy, intelligence, communications and enforcement remain aligned with the client's objective.
Where AMROR can assist
Capital decisions need commercial discipline.
What structure fits?
Funding, insurance, enforcement finance or other capital options considered against the actual strategy.
Can it be packaged?
Claims framed for sophisticated counterparties with clear economics, evidence gaps and enforcement paths.
Does capital distort the objective?
Capital should support leverage and resolution, not push the client into litigation for its own sake.
Resolution capital should sharpen the client's options, not just capture the dispute.
AMROR's role is to keep the economics, pressure points and decision path aligned. Any capital solution must sit inside the wider strategy for recovery, containment or settlement.
Independence and transparency
Funding creates power. It can also create conflicts.
Sophisticated clients will rightly ask who is advising, who is funding, who is being paid and whether any incentives affect the strategy recommended. The purpose is not simply to secure capital, but to test whether capital helps the client reach a better outcome on terms that remain strategically, commercially and ethically sound.
Typical questions
Is the dispute worth pursuing?
What is the enforcement path?
What budget is realistic?
Would funding improve the client's options or merely prolong the dispute?
How should settlement value be assessed before capital is committed?
